|
|
|
myOtaku.com: Keiko Inchihara
|
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
*sigh*..... *sigh*.....*sigh*
We had a blackout today... and we were all piled into the cafeteria... It took us five minutes too long to get quiet and just as the principal was going to dismiss us from school... The lights came back! After 47 friggin' minutes, they decide to go back on!!! I can't believe it!!!
I'm supposed to be writing an essay on the rhetorical strategies of E.M. Forster. Yet I am finding this inconveniently difficult to do. Why is this so? Well, let me tell you.
1. The idea of analyzing rhetoric is laughable. There is no sense in analyzing things which were done completely subconsciously. Anyone who has ever written anything knows that rhetoric is not the kind of thing one thinks about while writing, ie: "Aha! I know! I'll throw in some ethos now! That'll catch 'em!"
2. My interest in E.M. Forster is minimal. Having been forced into writing about him, I really don't care to do so. Sorry, Mr. Forster, you're a good writer and all, but I know better. Here's a hint: his initials are JRRT. Hell, I know writers who are equally as effective as Forster (if not more so) at FFN.
I shall give my introduction another shot.
KI
Comments
(4)
« Home |
|
