Jump to User:

myOtaku.com: Shinken


Monday, May 3, 2004


   How does this make sense?
It doesn't.

Apparently, running the pictures of what American soldiers put Iraqi prisoners through is a threat to American lives.

"The end zone here is that the American media have to be very careful about what we give our enemies. Lives are at stake." What? 'Give our enemies'? Give me a break! The American people (along with everyone else in the world) has a right to know exactly what happened. Word-of-mouth simply isn't enough in a situation like this, as exaggeration (or downplaying the severity of the incident) is bound to occur. Concrete proof is needed. (Although, some people are hinting that the photographs could have been staged, are fakes, etc.) Some people also say that the photographs needed to be taken, but should have remained in government custody as classified... stuff. That's a surefire way to gain the trust of a nation.

And then there are those who say that, since the Iraqis (under Saddam's regime) tortured people, then they deserve it, and we are justified in doing so. If you follow this line of "thought" (I use the term loosely), then tear your unused brain from your skull- your spinal cord should suffice. As Gandhi said, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."

Oh, and where does Bill come up with this being a threat to American lives? I mean, yes, some terrorists could be angered because of the photos, but it would be just one more excuse. Hell, I'm sure there's at least one terrorist who joined up because he got a bad cup of mojo in a Starbuck's! O'Reilly seems to be grabbing at nothing here. That, and subtly pimping himself.

"I would run the story but not the pictures. I'd describe them using vivid words. But I could not put my fellow countrymen, I should say, in even more danger than they are now by running the photographs."

Come on, Bill. Get off your soapbox, open it, and put a bar in your mouth. And another random orifice.

Comments (1)

« Home