|
|
Thursday, January 13, 2005
Back
okay yeah, the important thing: which is better, an egotist or an altruist? if u don't know what these mean, an egotist is one who puts himself before all others, and an altrusit is one who puts others above himself. The answer....an Egotist. Why? here it is: why is it that everything that is good has to be unselfish? its because the want to destroy the individual. there are 2 types of people in this world, the individual and the second-hander. The individual lives for himself, thus leads him (or her) to create on his own, his sole motivation is himself. the love for himself and his work tends to let him accomplish many things, not to impress or rule but to satisfy HIMSELF. the second-hander creates nothin from his own hand, he only leeches from the individual. he cannot survive without another to live for him, to carry him with his own energy. An indivual doesn't need or ask anything for another, only to respect his indivuality, and gives the same to everyone else. the second-hander needs everything from someone else. people look at napoleon and ceasar as selfish, greedy egotists, but they obviously don't know the words truest definition. an egotist does not need anyone. Rulers do. To govern, to rule, to dominate, all presuppose victims, therefore they need others. the egotist is the one who support the entire society, yet the second-hander doesn't want him to know it. so he plots to destroy him. look at all of the people defined as great, all of them were impeded by the second-hander. for example, 2pac. he was a genuis, but the second-hander wants u to look at him as a menace. U see my point? i just wanted to share that with u guys. if u want more on this philosophy, check out the Fountainhead by Ayn Rand. Its brilliant. well see ya
-Terra Zero
Comments
(13)
« Home |
|
