myOtaku.com
• Join Today!

My Pages
• Home
• Portfolio
• Guestbook
• Quiz Results

Vitals

Birthday
• 1988-05-22
Gender
• Female
Location
• USA
Member Since
• 2005-10-06
Occupation
• your worshiped
Real Name
• call me Sinny

Personal

Achievements
• ...Seriously...?
Anime Fan Since
• November 2004
Favorite Anime
• Fullmetal Alchemist, Wolfe Brothers
Goals
• WORLD DOMINATION! Kidding seriously, that's Monkie's job.
Hobbies
• I have none but if I was going for some: martial arts, falconry, scribbling, typing, poise, balance, grace, eatting, sleeping, jumping around, and just stuff like that
Talents
• alchemy/science...so I guess none




Jump to User:

myOtaku.com: The Eighth Sin


Wednesday, August 1, 2007

   ouroboros
I don't have anything to say. I just was looking through some old alchemy texts and found the ouroboros in the Book of Lambspring. The story with this goes that there was a great dragon in this forest. It was very poisonous. It ate it's poisonous tail and produced a very powerful medicine. something like that. It's from the 17th century, but I'm fairly close if it's not right. I thought I'd just explain it a little so that it doesn't pass off as a Satanic symbol or something.

In other randomness, we tried to work over the phone on our show. Elite ended up drawing and I ended up reading stuff from a different story. This stuff was horrific. I'll never do a proper death scene if I don't get over it. I think it was just bad because I thought it was a different chapter and it wasn't. When something starts off using the word grotesque, that's bad, especially when you didn't expect it.

I got parahuman's Zeme, Nicolaia up. I messed her up. Zeme's are all based off dogs, colors and stuff, and she's supposed to be a black and tan. I hadn't seen a black and tan in a long time when I originally drew her. I'm so disappointed about that, but oh well. She's just an untypical black and tan. I should put up some info on Zemes, since they're my only thing on here, but I don't feel like it right now. Got to work.

SGAH
Comments (2)

« Home